Table of Contents
I 'd include Toyota 2/3TC motor is someplace in the leading 3 but with those domestics you absolutely have my leading 4 of perpetuity for integrity. Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine concern. Rust is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel.
I question just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own way ... the 300i6 would certainly do everything I require this truck to do patgizz created: 3 points in the automobile globe refuse to damage.
those ought to be held as the standard to which every little thing else is gauged. Nearly whatever else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 naturally) Wow, because of the outpour of appreciation, it looked good so I purchased it, below's the advertisement lmk what you men assume Oops, really did not mean to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz though, I'm relatively large, and the guiding wheel to seat is rather narrow ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only trouble I've ever seen with vehicles like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little too tough and they would certainly break right at the floorboard.
Maintain in mind the gas mileage won't be the very best worldwide, but it will damn sure run forever. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had plenty of space in the taxicab of them. wbjones created: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine issue.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just sounded like a diesel. I wonder just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a hard time obtaining out of it's very own means ... The engine bay wasn't designed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One Canister remove an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, but it sucks.
"They are typically dependable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
Rust is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not make clear ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I included that point since when I had to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with each in every junkyard in South Jacket to locate one that wasn't sludged up actually badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to speak regarding a couple of issues of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and say one is far better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same lorry.
Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines then. Let's chat about engine and in fact simply to specify that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around given that, you understand, around that time too. Because 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with impact to these engines, because they really did not have adequate threading in the spark plug, which caused troubles.
Really extremely cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't make clear ... my poor In respond to spitfirebill: I included that point due to the fact that when I had to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up really severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to speak concerning a few problems of these vans, however I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is much better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same car.
They seem to be a little bit more made use of in that area, but, you understand, those are several of the usages, however they're essentially the same classification of lorry. Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines after that. What concerns do you see in between these two cars? Bernie: Yeah. Allow's chat about engine and in fact just to specify that the version years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around since, you recognize, around that time as well. So we're not going to get back into, into the earlier stuff. Given that 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more popular and I wouldn't actually suggest a V6 engine.
So, you know, Fords, and a lot of them come with the Triton V8. There's a great deal of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 ignition system with blow to these engines, since they didn't have sufficient threading in the ignition system, which created issues. And commonly that would certainly occur when you could be in a 15 passenger bus rising a hill with a load of individuals and all of a sudden boom, an ignition system pops out and you're stranded.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer near me Colorado Springs, Minnesota
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealer